To subscribe, advertise or contribute articles to smartmanufacturingtoday.com contact publisher@xtra.co.nz

  • Home
  • Newswire
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • About
Smart Manufacturing Today
Your source of info
  • Developments
  • Manufacturing Technology
  • Latest News
  • Featured
  • Computer Integrated Manufacturing
  • Robotics
  • Manufacturing Software
  • Internet of Things
  • Additive Manufacturing
  • Product Design
  • 3D Printing
  • Supply Chain
  • Workshop Tools
  • PLM & CAD/CAM
  • Covid-19
  • Events
  • Motors & Drives
  • The Circular Economy

News Ticker

Embracing equity for women in STEM
Operational technology security in smart manufacturing
Decarbonise while you Digitalise
Is low-code the future of manufacturing?
Network Monitoring – The competitive differentiator in manufacturing
Delivering supply chain resiliency across the fabricated metals industry with ERP
Detecting faults: A stitch in time for manufacturing?
The missing link in Industry 4.0’s connectivity chain

AI can’t solve everything

The hysteria about the future of artificial intelligence (AI) is everywhere. There seems to be no shortage of sensationalist news about how AI could cure diseases, accelerate human innovation and improve human creativity. Just looking at the media headlines, you might think that we are already living in a future where AI has infiltrated every aspect of society.

While it is undeniable that AI has opened up a wealth of promising opportunities, it has also led to the emergence of a mindset that can be best described as “AI solutionism”. This is the philosophy that, given enough data, machine learning algorithms can solve all of humanity’s problems.

But there’s a big problem with this idea. Instead of supporting AI progress, it jeopardises the value of machine intelligence by disregarding important AI safety principles and setting unrealistic expectations about what AI can really do for humanity.

AI solutionism

In only a few years, AI solutionism has made its way from the technology evangelists’ mouths in Silicon Valley to the minds of government officials and policymakers around the world.

3d rendering humanoid robot with ai text in ciucuit pattern
3d rendering humanoid robot with ai text in ciucuit pattern.

The pendulum has swung from the dystopian notion that AI will destroy humanity to the utopian belief that our algorithmic saviour is here.

We are now seeing governments pledge support to national AI initiatives and compete in a technological and rhetorical arms race to dominate the burgeoning machine learning sector.

For example, the UK government has vowed to invest £300m in AI research to position itself as a leader in the field. Enamoured with the transformative potential of AI, the French president Emmanuel Macron committed to turn France into a global AI hub.

Meanwhile, the Chinese government is increasing its AI prowess with a national plan to create a Chinese AI industry worth US$150 billion by 2030. AI solutionism is on the rise and it is here to stay.

Neural networks – easier said than done

While many political manifestos tout the transformative effects of the looming “AI revolution”, they tend to understate the complexity around deploying advanced machine learning systems in the real world.

One of the most promising varieties of AI technologies are neural networks. This form of machine learning is loosely modelled after the neuronal structure of the human brain but on a much smaller scale.

Many AI-based products use neural networks to infer patterns and rules from large volumes of data. But what many politicians do not understand is that simply adding a neural network to a problem will not automatically mean that you’ll find a solution.

Similarly, adding a neural network to a democracy does not mean it will be instantaneously more inclusive, fair or personalised.

Challenging the data bureaucracy

AI systems need a lot of data to function, but the public sector typically does not have the appropriate data infrastructure to support advanced machine learning. Most of the data remains stored in offline archives.

The few digitised sources of data that exist tend to be buried in bureaucracy. More often than not, data is spread across different government departments that each require special permissions to be accessed.

Above all, the public sector typically lacks the human talent with the right technological capabilities to fully reap the benefits of machine intelligence.

For these reasons, the sensationalism over AI has attracted many critics. Stuart Russell, a professor of computer science at Berkeley, has long advocated a more realistic approach that focuses on simple everyday applications of AI instead of the hypothetical takeover by super-intelligent robots.

Similarly, MIT’s professor of robotics, Rodney Brooks, writes that “almost all innovations in robotics and AI take far, far, longer to be really widely deployed than people in the field and outside the field imagine”.

One of the many difficulties in deploying machine learning systems is that AI is extremely susceptible to adversarial attacks. This means that a malicious AI can target another AI to force it to make wrong predictions or to behave in a certain way.

Many researchers have warned against the rolling out of AI without appropriate security standards and defence mechanisms. Still, AI security remains an often-overlooked topic.

Machine learning is not magic

If we are to reap the benefits and minimise the potential harms of AI, we must start thinking about how machine learning can be meaningfully applied to specific areas of government, business and society. This means we need to have a discussion about AI ethics and the distrust that many people have towards machine learning.

Most importantly, we need to be aware of the limitations of AI and where humans still need to take the lead. Instead of painting an unrealistic picture of the power of AI, it is important to take a step back and separate the actual technological capabilities of AI from magic.

 

Share this:

Related Posts

Helen Blomqvist

Developments /

Embracing equity for women in STEM

Alex Mosher

Latest News /

Operational technology security in smart manufacturing

Decarbonise PIC

Manufacturing Technology /

Decarbonise while you Digitalise

‹ Miniaturised “warehouse robots” for biotechnology applications› Ingenious: The Unintended Consequences of Human Innovation
NZ RS Online, 2021 New Year

Recent Posts

  • Embracing equity for women in STEM
  • Operational technology security in smart manufacturing
  • Decarbonise while you Digitalise
  • Is low-code the future of manufacturing?
  • Network Monitoring – The competitive differentiator in manufacturing

Categories

  • 3D Printing
  • Additive Manufacturing
  • Computer Integrated Manufacturing
  • Covid-19
  • Developments
  • Events
  • Featured
  • Internet of Things
  • Latest News
  • Manufacturing Software
  • Manufacturing Technology
  • Motors & Drives
  • PLM & CAD/CAM
  • Product Design
  • Robotics
  • Supply Chain
  • The Circular Economy
  • Workshop Tools

Back to Top

  • Developments
  • Manufacturing Technology
  • Latest News
  • Featured
  • Computer Integrated Manufacturing
  • Robotics
  • Manufacturing Software
  • Internet of Things
  • Additive Manufacturing
  • Product Design
  • 3D Printing
  • Supply Chain
  • Workshop Tools
  • PLM & CAD/CAM
  • Covid-19
  • Events
  • Motors & Drives
  • The Circular Economy

To subscribe, advertise or contribute articles to smartmanufacturingtoday.com contact publisher@xtra.co.nz

(c) Smart Manufacturing Today, 2023